Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Trevor Jones Lovelace Saruwaka v Speaker of National Assembly N.O and The Clerk of Parliament and The Chief Security Officer Parliament of Zimbabwe N.O

HH 717-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
25 October 2017
Citation
HH 717-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 717
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
MAKONI J
Full Bench
MAKONI J
Areas of Law
Constitutional LawAdministrative Law
Keywords
Section 60 ConstitutionRastafarianStanding OrdersSpeaker discretion
Tags
Freedom of ReligionParliamentary ProcedureConstitutional Rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • Constitution of Zimbabwe, 2013
  • National Assembly Standing Rules and Orders
  • Interpretation Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the application is properly before the court given the previous ruling by TAGU J","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The matter was removed from the urgent roll by TAGU J"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the ejectment of the applicant from Parliament violates his right to freedom of conscience and religion under Section 60 of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The applicant was ejected for wearing a Rastafari jacket"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the Speaker's actions were authorized by law (Standing Orders)","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The Speaker acted under Standing Orders"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, a Member of Parliament, was barred from attending parliamentary sessions and pre-budget consultative meetings for wearing a colourful Rastafari jacket. He argued this violated his constitutional right to freedom of religion under Section 60. The respondents opposed, citing the Speaker's discretion under Standing Orders and raising a point in limine regarding urgency.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →