Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Trustco Mobile (Pty) Ltd and Trustco Group International (Pty) Ltd v Econet Wireless (Pvt) Ltd and First Mutual Life Assurance Group

HH 211-11

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
12 October 2011
Citation
HH 211-11
Neutral Citation
[2011] ZWHH 211
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
Mavangira J
Full Bench
Mavangira J
Areas of Law
Arbitration LawCivil ProcedureCommercial Law
Keywords
Arbitration ActArticle 9Interim measure of protectionLeave to executeAppealability
Tags
ArbitrationInterim MeasuresExecution Pending Appeal
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Arbitration Act
  • High Court Act
  • Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the judgment in HC 6065/11 is subject to appeal in light of Article 9(4) of the Arbitration Act","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The judgment was granted pursuant to Article 9 of the Arbitration Act"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether leave to execute pending appeal should be granted","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Non-compliance with order, need for access to systems, balance of convenience"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

On 17 August 2011, the first applicant and respondents concluded an agreement for licensing intellectual property to provide free life insurance to cellular phone users. Differences arose, leading the first applicant to file an urgent application (HC 6065/11) which resulted in a provisional order in its favor on 25 July 2011. The first respondent noted an appeal to the Supreme Court (SC 171/11) but did not comply with the order, prompting this urgent chamber application for leave to execute the judgment pending appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →