{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitral award should be set aside on the grounds that it conflicts with the public policy of Zimbabwe.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The arbitrator's reliance on POSB rent and the alleged unreasonableness of the award."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator breached the rules of natural justice by not treating parties equally.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The applicant's claim that the arbitrator ignored their evidence."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator failed to give reasons for the award as required by Article 31(2) of the Model Law.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The applicant's submission that no reasons were given."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant and 1st respondent entered into a lease agreement which contained an arbitration clause for rent disputes. An arbitrator was appointed to determine fair rent for the period July to December 2011. The arbitrator set the rent at $19.40 per square metre, relying on comparable evidence, particularly the rent achieved by POSB in the same building. The applicant applied to set aside the award, alleging it was against public policy and breached natural justice.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases