{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in law in finding that the respondents' contracts of employment are still subsisting and subsequently awarding salaries and benefits","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Contracts expired June 2006, not renewed"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in law in awarding 24, 26, and 31 months salary and benefits as damages","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Quantification award amounts"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant approached the court with \"dirty hands\" by not applying for suspension of the arbitral award","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant did not seek suspension"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant appealed against an arbitrator's award quantifying salary and benefits arrears for three former employees whose contracts expired in June 2006 but were not lawfully terminated. The arbitrator found the contracts remained valid until lawful termination and awarded substantial arrears and ongoing payments.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases