Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Supreme Court

Valentine Ziswa and Margaret Ziswa v Graeme Shaun Chadwick and Landos Farm (Private) Limited

SC 92/22

Case Details

Court
Supreme Court
Date
29 July 2022
Citation
SC 92/22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWSC 92
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Cross-Appeal

Bench

Presiding
KUDYA AJA
Full Bench
UCHENA JAMAKONI JAKUDYA AJA
Areas of Law
Contract LawLaw of AgencyLaw of Evidence
Keywords
LeaseJoint VentureNon-variation ClauseWaiver by ConductCorporate VeilExpert EvidenceDepreciated Replacement Cost
Tags
Lease AgreementContractual BreachWaiverAgencyValuation of Damages
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Lease and Joint Venture Agreements dated 9 January 2009
  • Lease and Joint Venture Agreements dated 9 January 2009
  • Lease and Joint Venture Agreements dated 9 January 2009
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the non-variation clause in the lease agreement was waived by the parties' conduct.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Chadwick's payment of rent at 8% and correspondence reflecting this rate."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the second cross-respondent (Landos Farm (Private) Limited) was liable for the claims.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The Company's involvement in operations and correspondence."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the High Court erred in its assessment of witness credibility (Ziswa vs Chadwick).","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The High Court's reliance on demeanour and its findings on Ziswa's greed and Chadwick's reliability."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the claim for rentals for the fourth season.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Calculation of gross tobacco realization and application of the 8% rate."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the High Court erred in dismissing the claim for the value of developments in lieu of the centre pivot.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Status of the centre pivot as a permanent structure and value of other developments."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the High Court erred in dismissing claims for missing and damaged property.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The valuator's evidence and the state of the property at exit."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the High Court erred in dismissing claims for maize deliveries and tobacco seedlings.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Terms of the JVA regarding maize and the status of seedlings as \"crop\"."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The parties entered into a verbal lease agreement and later formalized it with a written lease and a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) on 9 January 2009. A dispute arose regarding arrear rentals, maintenance of leased equipment, and alleged removal of property by the lessee, leading to litigation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →