{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator erred in not awarding damages in lieu of reinstatement","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The appellant argued that reinstatement was not tenable and damages should have been awarded"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Arbitrator erred in allowing the respondent to commence fresh disciplinary proceedings","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The arbitrator ordered reinstatement but allowed employer to conduct fresh disciplinary process"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appellant was properly convicted on the misconduct charges","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The appellant was convicted on two counts of misconduct"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant, employed as Finance Director, was suspended on 8 September 2010 and subsequently dismissed for misconduct charges related to failure to draw contracts for contractual workers and inflating her salary in a loan application. The suspension was found to be procedurally defective, rendering subsequent disciplinary proceedings invalid.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases