consultancy feecommissionverbal agreementabsolution from the instance
Tags
contractconsultancycommission
legislation
Statutes Cited
Not applicable
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff has established a prima facie case to justify the defendant to answer","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff's failure to provide reliable evidence on sales profit and inclusion of old business invoices"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the claimed commission","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Calculation of commission based on sales profit for new business only"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff sued for US$7,541.41 in commission and other fees, alleging a verbal agreement where it would be paid 10% commission on sales profit for new business generated. The defendant admitted the contract but disputed the calculation of profits, and at trial, the plaintiff failed to distinguish between new and old business or provide reliable profit figures.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases