Walezim Investments (Private) Limited v (1) The Sheriff of the High Court (2) Crombil Investments (Private) Limited (3) Temba Hwati and Five Others (4) Muvingi & Mugadza Legal Practitioners (5) Registrar of Deeds

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether payment of the debt by the appellant after the confirmation of the sale vitiated the sale in execution and any consequent actions.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Confirmation of sale on 13 November 2017; appellant's payment of judgment debt after confirmation; second respondent's payment of purchase price and acquisition of title."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the second respondent had the right to evict the appellant from the property and claim holding over damages.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second respondent obtained title; appellant in occupation; eviction application."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in holding that the first respondent's decision to confirm the sale was administrative and could not be usurped.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Sheriff's confirmation of sale; appellant's challenge to the decision."}

Background