Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

WALKTALL (PVT) LTD v SHEPHERD TUNDIYA

HH 346-13

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
16 September 2013
Citation
HH 346-13
Neutral Citation
[2013] ZWHH 346
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
HUNGWE J
Full Bench
HUNGWE J
Areas of Law
Property LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
Lease CancellationEjectmentArrear RentalsHolding Over DamagesStriking Out
Tags
Lease AgreementDefault JudgmentPre-trial Conference
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 1971
  • Law Society By-Laws, 1982
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the defendant was in wilful default of attendance at the pre-trial conference","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant's absence on 16 September 2013; claim of appearing in magistrate's court"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the plaintiff is entitled to striking out of defence and counter-claim","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defendant's failure to comply with court directive under Rule 182"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the lease agreement should be cancelled and defendant ejected","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Arrear rentals; defendant's default"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff applied for default judgment after the defendant failed to attend a pre-trial conference. The defendant claimed to be appearing in another court but the court found this to be wilful default. The plaintiff sought cancellation of lease agreement, ejectment, arrear rentals, holding over damages, and costs.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →