fixed term contractlegitimate expectationunfair dismissalLabour Act
Tags
fixed term contractlegitimate expectationcasualization of labour
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding that there was no legitimate expectation of re-engagement.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's claim based on job continuing"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in finding that the appellant failed to prove another person was engaged in his place.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellant's allegation of replacement"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator's failure to determine the issue of casualization of labour constitutes a gross misdirection.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's claim of casualization"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant was employed on a fixed term contract as Sports Officer at Great Zimbabwe University. His contract expired on 30 June 2013 and was not renewed. He claimed unfair dismissal based on legitimate expectation and casualization of labour. The arbitrator dismissed his claim, leading to this appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases