CHIDYAUSIKU CJMALABA DCJGWAUNZA JAGOWORA JAHLATSHWAYO JAGUVAVA JAMAVANGIRA AJACHIWESHE AJAMAKONI AJA
Areas of Law
Constitutional LawCriminal LawProperty Law
Keywords
Compulsory AcquisitionEvictionCompensationDeprivation of PropertyDisabled PersonsUnlawful Occupation
Tags
Land ReformProperty RightsDisability RightsHuman Rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20), 2013
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20), 2013
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20), 2013
Constitution of the Republic of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20), 2013
Gazetted Land (Consequential Provisions) Act
Gazetted Land (Consequential Provisions) Act
Land Acquisition Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether eviction of the applicant from compulsorily acquired land without paying compensation for improvements amounts to unlawful deprivation of property under section 72(3)(a) and (b) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"State acquired land; applicant occupied without authority; no compensation paid for improvements before eviction"}
{"issue_text":"Whether eviction of a physically disabled person constitutes breach of State obligations under section 2 and violation of rights under section 83 of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant is bilateral below knee amputee; State seeks eviction"}
{"issue_text":"Whether eviction without prior compensation amounts to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment under section 53 of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant faces eviction without immediate compensation"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, a former owner of agricultural land compulsorily acquired by the State, was charged with unlawful occupation of gazetted land. He raised constitutional questions regarding his eviction without prior compensation for improvements and alleged violations of his rights as a disabled person. The Constitutional Court found that eviction following criminal conviction does not require pre-payment of compensation and does not violate constitutional rights.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases