{"issue_text":"Whether the founding affidavit contains admissible evidence or inadmissible hearsay","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The deponent to the founding affidavit is the applicant's legal practitioner who does not indicate the source of information for facts not within her personal knowledge"}
{"issue_text":"Whether there is a valid application before the court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The validity of the application depends on the validity of the founding affidavit"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to register a caveat against two properties owned by the 1st and 2nd respondents to secure a claim of US$26,700.00 in a separate pending matter. The application was struck off the roll because the founding affidavit, deposed to by the applicant's legal practitioner, contained inadmissible hearsay evidence and was procedurally defective.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases