Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Bulawayo High Court

Willing Shoko v Belia Zibowa and Others

HB 229/22

Case Details

Court
Bulawayo High Court
Date
8 September 2022
Citation
HB 229/22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHB 229
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
DUBE-BANDA J
Full Bench
DUBE-BANDA J
Areas of Law
Civil ProcedureProperty LawConveyancing
Keywords
supplementary affidavitprivate treatySheriffRegistrar of Deedsdeed of settlement
Tags
Additional affidavitLeave to fileMotion proceedingsPleadings
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 2021
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has established exceptional circumstances to justify the granting of leave to file a further affidavit out of sequence.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The documents were in existence and in the possession of the applicant's legal practitioners when the initial opposing affidavit was filed; the main application is ripe for hearing."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant provided a satisfactory explanation for the failure to include the documents in his initial opposing affidavit.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The applicant claims he did not have subjective knowledge of the documents; the documents were prepared by his own legal practitioners."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the documents sought to be introduced are relevant and necessary for the fair determination of the main application.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The documents relate to the sale and transfer of the property which is the subject of the main application."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought leave to file a supplementary affidavit in a main application to introduce an agreement of sale, a declaration by seller, and a deed of settlement regarding the sale of a property. The main application sought to review and set aside the sale of the property to the applicant, alleging it was unlawful. The court found the applicant had failed to provide a satisfactory explanation for not producing these documents earlier, as they were in the possession of his legal practitioners when the main application was filed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →