{"issue_text":"Whether the consent order dated 2 June 2015 is ambiguous and unenforceable, justifying its correction under Order 49 r 449(1) of the High Court Rules, 1971.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The order prevents execution until HC 9816/13 is finalized; the respondent controls that case and has stalled it."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant sought to vary a consent order dated 2 June 2015, which prevented execution until another case (HC 9816/13) was finalized. The applicant argued the order was ambiguous and unenforceable because the condition for execution depended entirely on the respondent's actions in the other case, which the respondent was not prosecuting.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases