construction contractbreach of contractcounterclaim
legislation
Statutes Cited
N/A
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether or not the new storage area is valued at $24,714.77?","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff's claim for construction of new storage area; Quantity surveyor's valuation of US$13,098.59"}
{"issue_text":"Whether or not the plaintiff supplied and fixed a full fire scope system and if so what is its value?","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff's claim for fire scope system; Plaintiff's admission that hydraulic tests were not done; Warranty expired"}
{"issue_text":"Whether or not the plaintiff properly completed installation of the electrical works?","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Plaintiff's withdrawal of electrical works claims; Defendant's counterclaim for defects"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff contractor sued for payment for construction of a new storage area and installation of a fire scope system. The defendant counterclaimed for damages due to substandard electrical works and defects in the storage area construction. The plaintiff withdrew its claim for electrical works during trial.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases