World Education v Phanuel Kapfudzaruwa

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has reasonable prospects of success on appeal to justify granting leave to appeal.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"All grounds of appeal raised by the applicant."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the Court a quo misdirected itself regarding prospects of success and irreparable harm.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant's argument that it would suffer irreparable harm by paying US$100,296.00."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the Court a quo erred in holding that the application was meritless regarding the existence of an employment contract versus a consultancy contract.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The existence of the Consultancy Agreement and the employment contract."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the Court a quo misdirected itself on the facts regarding medical aid forms and project documents.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Medical aid forms and project documents outlining work up to 2015."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the Consultancy Agreement novated the employment contract.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The Consultancy Agreement dated 7 February 2013."}
• {"issue_text":"Whether the damages award was appropriate given the alleged 12-month contract and probation period.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The nature of the alleged employment contract (12 months with probation)."}

Background