Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

ZAKEYO MEREKI v BELL IN (PVT) LTD and THE DEPUTY SHERIFF HARARE (N.O)

HH 113-2005

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
7 December 2005
Citation
HH 113-2005
Neutral Citation
[2005] ZWHH 113
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Application

Bench

Presiding
BHUNU J
Full Bench
BHUNU J
Areas of Law
Constitutional LawProperty LawLand Law
Keywords
Land AcquisitionSection 8(1) OrderProvisional OrderRes JudicataSuspended Order
Tags
Land ReformConstitutional AmendmentOffer LetterEvictionInterdict
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • Land Acquisition Act
  • Constitutional Amendment Number 17
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant is in contempt of court for filing the application before being served with the previous order","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The applicant filed counter-application before being served with the provisional order obtained by 1st respondent"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the matter is res judicata due to the previous provisional order","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"1st respondent obtained provisional order evicting applicant; applicant seeks suspension of that order"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant has established a basis to suspend the earlier provisional order","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's offer letter, expiry of 90-day notice period, Constitutional Amendment No. 17"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether re-issued offer letters after Constitutional Amendment No. 17 are valid","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Offer letter dated 10th November 2005 issued after Constitutional Amendment"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the applicant is entitled to evict the 1st respondent","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's occupation rights vs 1st respondent's former ownership"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, a beneficiary of the land reform program, was issued an offer letter for land in Zvimba District. After Constitutional Amendment No. 17 came into effect, he was re-offered the same land. The former owner (1st respondent) obtained a provisional order evicting the applicant. The applicant then launched this counter-application to suspend that order and declare his right to occupy.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →