Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Zhang Bin and Zhang Bin N.O v Jiang Shin Civil Explosive (Private) Limited and Wu Jianchun and Zhang Suyi and Fan Xinhua and Vengesayi Mhlanga and The Master of the High Court and The Registrar of Companies and Other Business Entities N.O

HH 122-22

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
1 March 2022
Citation
HH 122-22
Neutral Citation
[2022] ZWHH 122
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Urgent Chamber application

Bench

Presiding
CHITAPI J
Full Bench
CHITAPI J
Areas of Law
Company LawProperty LawPractice and Procedure
Keywords
Interim DirectorsShareholdingCurator BonisWork PermitsProvisional Order
Tags
Company LawShareholding DisputeUrgent Application
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, 2021
  • High Court Rules, 2021
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the matter was urgent and justified hearing on the urgent roll.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Timing of application; knowledge of dispute in June 2021; detention of respondents."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the respondents (3rd and 4th) were legally permitted to manage the company given their lack of work permits.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Admission by counsel that respondents did not hold work permits."}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether the court should grant the provisional order in terms of the draft or vary it.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The applicant sought specific interim directors; the court considered the company's internal governance."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant, curator bonis of her deceased husband's estate, sought an urgent provisional order to manage the first respondent company's operations due to a disputed shareholding transfer and the respondents' lack of valid work permits. The respondents opposed the application, arguing it was not urgent and that the applicant's appointment of directors was invalid.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →