{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator made a gross misdirection factually which amounts to a point of law on whether Appellants refused to sign their contracts","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appellants' refusal to sign contracts, claim of seeking legal advice"}
{"issue_text":"Is the continuous renewal of fixed term contracts illegal and does such renewal give birth to a contract without limit of time","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Continuous renewals over 1-9 years, donor-funded NGO status"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellants were employees of the respondent on fixed term contracts that expired on 31st May 2011. The respondent, a donor-funded NGO, offered contract renewals, but the appellants did not sign them, claiming they sought legal advice. The appellants then claimed unfair dismissal, arguing that continuous renewals created permanent contracts.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases