{"issue_text":"Whether the defendant's claim for way leave charges has prescribed","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Way leave charges arose in 2011; counterclaim served 19 August 2016; 3-year vs 30-year prescription period"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the defendant's by-laws authorizing way leave charges are valid","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"By-laws issued under Urban Councils Act; plaintiff claims ultra vires Electricity Act"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The plaintiff, Zimbabwe Electricity Transmission and Distribution Company, sued the defendant, Zvishavane Town Council, for $4,646,348.60 for electricity supplied. The defendant admitted the debt but counterclaimed for $10,664,567.50 in rates, service charges, and way leave charges, claiming set-off. The plaintiff challenged the validity of way leave charges and raised prescription as a defence to part of the counterclaim.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases