Prosecutorial independenceSecurity servicesFair trial rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) 2013
Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the employment of serving members of security services as prosecutors violates Section 208(4) of the Constitution","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Employment of security members in NPA"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the applicants have standing to bring this application","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicants are prosecutors, not accused persons"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the NPA is a civilian institution","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"NPA's status under Constitution"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicants challenged the employment of serving members of security services as prosecutors by the National Prosecuting Authority, alleging it violates constitutional provisions regarding civilian institutions and the right to a fair trial. The respondents argued the NPA is sui generis and not prohibited by Section 208(4).
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases