{"issue_text":"Whether the grounds of appeal raise points of law as required by section 98(10) of the Labour Act.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The respondent's preliminary points on the grounds of appeal."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the appraisal process was procedurally and substantively unfair.","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Composition of panel, period of assessment, rating method, compliance with performance contract."}
{"issue_text":"Whether signing the appraisal form constituted waiver or agreement.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The respondent signed the appraisal form."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the termination constituted unfair dismissal or automatic lapse of a fixed-term contract.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nature of probationary period and termination based on appraisal."}
{"issue_text":"Whether reinstatement was an appropriate remedy.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The arbitral award ordered reinstatement."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was employed by the appellant on a 36-month contract subject to a 3-month probationary period. His employment was terminated based on an appraisal that the court found to be procedurally and substantively flawed, as it did not comply with the employment contract's requirements and was conducted over an insufficient period. The Labour Court upheld the arbitral award ordering reinstatement.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases