{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo dealt with all the issues before it.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Appellant's counsel argued the court a quo did not determine the issue of damages computation."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the court a quo erred in setting aside the arbitral award.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The High Court set aside the award on grounds of public policy conflict."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant and first respondent entered into a construction contract for the first respondent's head office. A dispute arose regarding payment terms (USD vs ZWL at RBZ auction rate) and the appellant's failure to commence construction. The arbitrator found in favor of the appellant, awarding damages in USD. The High Court set aside the award, finding it contrary to public policy. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases