{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in hearing and determining a dispute that had been resolved by a Deed of Settlement","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Existence of Deed of Settlement, payment made, subsequent arbitration award"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The appellant appealed against an arbitration award that ordered payment of acting allowance and bonus. The appellant argued that the dispute had been settled by a Deed of Settlement and payment had been made. The court found that the Deed of Settlement was conclusive and the arbitrator had erred in re-opening the matter.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases