{"issue_text":"Whether the Labour Court erred in finding that the grounds of appeal did not raise points of law.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The nature of the grounds of appeal filed in the Labour Court."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the Labour Court should have dismissed the appeal or struck it off the roll.","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"The Labour Court's finding that the appeal was invalid."}
{"issue_text":"Whether the respondent had a legitimate expectation of her contract being renewed.","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes (on remittal)","related_facts":"The recommendations for renewal and the acting appointment."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The respondent was employed by the appellant as Finance Director on a fixed-term contract. Before its expiry, committees recommended her contract be renewed. However, upon expiry, she was appointed in an acting capacity indefinitely. Over a year later, she was given three months' notice of termination. The arbitrator found she had a legitimate expectation of renewal and was unfairly dismissed. The Labour Court dismissed the appellant's appeal on a procedural point, leading to this Supreme Court appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases