Zimbabwe Revenue Authority v Ronald Tafirenyika

Key Issues

• {"issue_text":"Did the Arbitrator err in ignoring and interfering with the Disciplinary Committee's factual findings?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator's interference with factual findings, concession by appellant on charge D24"}
• {"issue_text":"Did the Arbitrator err in finding that the Respondent did not breach Section D25 of the Appellant's Code of Conduct?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Discovery of uncleared goods in respondent's bedroom, employment contract clauses"}
• {"issue_text":"Did appellant prove its case on a balance of probabilities?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Possession of uncleared goods, employment contract breach"}
• {"issue_text":"Was circumstantial evidence properly admissible and considered?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Circumstantial evidence regarding possession of goods"}
• {"issue_text":"Was the remedy of reinstatement appropriate?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Nature of misconduct, repudiation of contract"}

Background