wasted costsnotice of withdrawalhigher scale costs
Tags
withdrawal of applicationcostsattorney and client scale
legislation
Statutes Cited
Labour Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Should costs be awarded on an attorney and client scale?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondent's request for higher scale costs based on alleged arrogance by Applicant's Counsel."}
{"issue_text":"Is the Applicant required to tender wasted costs upon withdrawal?","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant's withdrawal without tendering costs and Respondent's objection."}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, ZIMRA, filed an application for interim relief but later filed a notice of withdrawal without tendering the respondent's wasted costs. The respondent objected to the defective withdrawal and argued for costs on an attorney and client scale, alleging arrogance by the applicant's counsel. The court found the withdrawal defective but declined to award costs on a higher scale.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases