{"issue_text":"The arbitrator erred in making a finding that the respondents had been unfairly dismissed.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondents were turned away on 4 March 2014; internal memo of 12 December 2013"}
{"issue_text":"Whether or not the arbitrator awarded damages without substantiating them.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Respondents submitted schedule of moneys owed; arbitrator awarded six months' salary as damages without showing calculation"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator merely rubber stamped the respondents’ claims without any justification.","issue_type":"fact","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Arbitrator's determination on unlawful dismissal and damages"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred by dismissing the issue of prescription raised by the appellant.","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Claim period 2011 to 2014; dispute referred on 10 March 2014"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Seventeen respondents were employed by the appellant and referred a dispute of unfair dismissal and outstanding salaries for arbitration. The arbitrator ruled in their favor, leading to this appeal. The appellant argued there was no evidence of dismissal, damages were unsubstantiated, and the claim was prescribed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases